Firms under NY DFS Part 500 and SEC expectations are judged on documentation as much as control. We build environments where the evidence exists before anyone asks for it.
The Real Problem
Financial firms are targeted less by dramatic intrusions than by patient, convincing fraud — a compromised mailbox, a watched thread, and a payment instruction that arrives at exactly the right moment. The attack succeeds because it looks like ordinary business, which is precisely why technical controls have to catch what human judgment won’t.
An attacker sits in a mailbox for weeks, learns the language, then redirects a payment nobody questions.
Annual certifications signed on the basis of belief rather than a verified configuration and a record of it.
Custodians, administrators, and software vendors extend your perimeter well past your own office.
Communications retention obligations quietly unmet because nobody reconciled policy against platform settings.
What We Handle
Each requirement traced to the specific technical control that satisfies it, with the proof attached.
API-layer defense against phishing and business email compromise, tuned for the way your firm communicates.
MFA applied without the quiet exceptions that undo it — including service and legacy accounts.
Role-based permissions with scheduled recertification, so entitlements match current responsibilities.
A register of vendors touching firm or client data, with obligations tracked and reviewed on a cycle.
Continuous documentation and retention settings reconciled against your actual regulatory obligations.
The question isn’t whether the controls exist. It’s whether you can show they were working. Let’s find out.
